|
 |
|
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
|
|
| Year : 2019 | Volume
: 22
| Issue : 2 | Page : 187-194 |
| |
Study of middle cerebral artery in human cadaveric brain
Sandhya Arvind Gunnal, Mujeebuddin Samsamuddin Farooqui, Rajendra Namdeo Wabale
Department of Anatomy, Rural Medical College, PIMS, Loni, Maharashtra, India
| Date of Web Publication | 9-Apr-2019 |
Correspondence Address:
Mrs. Sandhya Arvind Gunnal
Department of Anatomy, Rural Medical College, Post. Loni, Tal. Rahata, Ahmednagar - 413 736, Maharashtra
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0972-2327.144289
 Abstract | | |
Background: Middle cerebral artery (MCA) is the larger terminal branch of the internal carotid artery. It travels through the Sylvian fissure on the insula. Objective: MCA supplies a large area of distribution than the other two cerebral arteries. Though it is so, there are very few articles in the literature describing MCA. Aim of the present work is to study the MCA regarding its origin, course, termination, branching pattern, morphometry and symmetry. Materials and Methods: 340 MCAs from 170 formalin preserved brains were dissected. Morphology, morphometry and symmetry of MCAs, were studied in detail and well photographed. The data collected in the study was analyzed. Results: Accessory MCA was found in seven specimens (2.05%). Duplicated MCA was seen in three specimens (0.88%). Aneurysm was found in three specimens (0.88%). MCA with bifurcated, trifurcated, quadrifurcated and single trunk termination was seen in 220 (64.70%), 42 (12.35%), 8 (2.35%), and in 70 (20.58%) specimens respectively. Bifurcated pattern as upper prominent trunk (type A), lower prominent trunk (type B) and both equal prominent trunks (type C) were seen in 63 (28.63%), 129 (58.63%), and 28 (12.72%) specimens respectively. Asymmetry was seen in 102 specimens (60%). Mean length and diameter of the MCA was 25.5-27.8 mm and 3 mm respectively. Conclusion: Awareness of these anatomical variations in branching patterns is important in neurovascular procedures. As very few Anatomical studies on MCA are there in the literature, this type of research work should be done by a number of scientists from a different region of the world in large scale.
Keywords: Anatomy, branching patterns, circle of Willis, middle cerebral artery, termination
How to cite this article:
Gunnal SA, Farooqui MS, Wabale RN. Study of middle cerebral artery in human cadaveric brain. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2019;22:187-94 |
| Introduction | |  |
Middle cerebral artery (MCA) is the larger terminal branch of the internal carotid artery (ICA).[1] It supplies a large area of distribution as compare to the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and posterior cerebral artery (PCA).[2],[3],[4],[5] However, the MCA supplies a wider area and has more cortical branches than the other two arteries, literature does not provide detailed information on it.[5] There are very few anatomical studies on MCA describing its morphology and branching pattern in its entirety. Aim of the present work is to study the MCA regarding its origin, course, termination, branching pattern, morphometry and symmetry.
The surgical nomenclature identifies four subdivisions of MCA: M1, M2, M3, and M4. From the termination from ICA to the bi-trifurcation, this segment is also known as the sphenoidal; M2 — the segment running in the lateral (Sylvian) fissure, also known as the insular; M3 — coming out of the lateral fissure, also known as the operator; and M4 — cortical portions. The MCA runs first in the lateral cerebral fissure, then posterosuperiorly on the insula, and divides into branches.[1]
| Materials and Methods | | |
Study was done in the Department of Anatomy, Rural Medical College, PIMS, Loni. The study was started by undertaking the institutional ethical clearance (PIMS/PhD/RC/2013/28). Three hundred and forty MCA were studied on 170 formalin preserved brains of human cadavers. The cadaveric bodies from which brains removed were of unknown age and unknown cause of death. The brains with the gross morphological variations were excluded from the study. Arachnoid mater in the interpeduncular fossa was removed carefully to expose the circle of Willis (CW). ICA at the lateral angle of the CW were identified and dissected to find out its terminal branches that is, MCA and ACA. MCA on either side were carefully dissected from its origin to its termination. Its course was traced through the lateral cerebral fissure. All the branches arising from MCA were dissected carefully. Branching pattern of MCA were seen, noted and well photographed. The arterial networks of the CW along with the MCA of both sides was carefully and delicately separated from brain tissue and pasted on the black plastic sheets for a better view. Dimensions of the MCA were measured with a vernier caliper with the least count of 0.01 mm. Thus, detailed study of these regarding morphological and morphometrical aspects were done.
| Observations and Results | | |
Origin, Course, Termination, and branching pattern was studied.
Origin
In all specimens, MCA was the branch of ICA. It was arising in the interpeduncular fossa at the lateral angle of the CW (100%) [Figure 1]a.
Accessory middle cerebral artery
Accessory MCA was found in seven specimens (2.05%). It was arising from the postcommunicating part of ACA. Out of seven specimens in five, accessory MCAs was seen in the right cerebral hemisphere and in two specimens it was in the left cerebral hemisphere [Figure 1]b.
Double middle cerebral artery
Duplicated origin of MCA was seen in three specimens (0.88%). Origin was seen at the termination of ICA. It was seen in two right cerebral hemispheres, and one left cerebral hemisphere [Figure 1]c.
Aneurysm
Aneurysm was seen in three specimens. (0.88%) It was seen in two right cerebral hemispheres, and one left cerebral hemisphere. A large globular aneurysm was seen at the insular portion of MCA. In two specimens, it was present at the trifurcation of the MCA. In other, it was seen at the bifurcation of the main stem of MCA at end of the first segment of MCA [Figure 1]d.
Course
After origin from the lateral angle from interpeduncular fossa, MCA runs toward the posterior end of the lateral sulcus of the cerebral hemispheres. It was divided into four parts spheroidal, insular, opercular and cortical.
Termination and branching pattern
According to the termination and branching pattern, MCA is classified into four different types. These are described in [Figure 2]a and [Table 1].
Terminations of MCA were observed as a normal bifurcation into M1 and M2 branches or continuation as angular artery with no trunk formation. Conventional termination of the MCA is by bifurcation as said above. Apart from this trifurcation, quadrifurcation and termination with a single trunk of MCA was also noted.
Middle cerebral artery bifurcation
Middle cerebral artery with bifurcated termination was seen in 220 specimens (64.70%) [Figure 2]b. Bilateral bifurcation of MCA was present in 55 specimens (50%). Unilateral bifurcation of MCA was present in 56 specimens (25.45%) on the left side and in 54 specimens (24.54%) on the right side.
Middle cerebral artery trifurcation
Middle cerebral artery with trifurcated termination were seen in 42 specimens (12.35%) [Figure 2]c. Bilateral trifurcation was present in three specimens (14.28%). Unilateral trifurcation was seen in 12 specimens (28.57%) on the left side, and 24 specimens (57.14%) on the right side.
Middle cerebral artery quadrifurcation
Quadrifurcated type of termination was seen in eight specimens (2.35%), four on the right side and four on the left side [Figure 2]d.
Middle cerebral artery with a single main stem
When the main stem of MCA runs from its origin up to the posterior end of lateral cerebral fissure, it is referred as the complete MCA with a single trunk. In this type, no secondary trunk formation was seen. All cortical branches arise from the main single stem of MCA. It was found in 70 specimens (20.58%) [Figure 2]e. Bilateral single stem was present in 32 specimens that is, in 16 specimens of brains (45.71%). Unilateral single stem was seen in 25 specimens (35.71%) on the left side, and in 13 specimens (18.57%) on the right side.
Further division of bifurcated pattern
Bifurcated stem was most commonly seen termination in the present study, in 220 specimens 64.70%. This branching pattern was further divided into three patterns according to the prominence of one of the two stems.
If upper stem was more prominent than the lower stem, it was named as the type A of bifurcated pattern. If lower stem was more prominent than the upper stem, it was named as type B of bifurcated pattern. If both the stems were in equal proportion, it was termed as type C of bifurcated pattern. Type A was seen in 63 Specimens 28.63% [Figure 3]a. Type B was seen in 129 Specimens 58.63% [Figure 3]b. Type C was seen in 28 Specimens 12.72% [Figure 3]c.
Branching patterns
Branching patterns of MCA studied in detail. According to the branching pattern of MCA, origin of cortical branches differs as orbital branches, frontal branches, parietal branches, and temporal branches. There were total 10 branches arising from the MCA having few variations seen as under.
Instead of the direct origin from the main stem branches may arise from large adjacent branches. Adjacent branches take origin from a short common trunk. In most of the above-seen cortical branches, small variation were observed in their origin. It was not uniform. All cortical branches have the course in the respective cerebral sulci. Cortical branches are shown in the [Figure 4]a, [Figure 4]b, [Figure 4]c, [Figure 4]d respectively.
Morphometry
Morphometric data of MCA was measured and tabulated in [Table 2].
Length of MCA was measured from its origin to its termination from the main stem. It varies greatly from 1 to 65 mm. with the mean of 25.54 mm and 27.86 mm on right and left side respectively.
Diameter of the MCA at its middle of the main stem was measured. It was ranging from 2 to 5 mm with the mean of 3 mm.
Symmetry
In addition to morphometry, we have also studied the symmetry in the subject.
Symmetrical branching of MCA was seen in 68 brain specimens (40%) [Figure 5]a and asymmetrical branching of MCA was seen in 102 brain specimens (60%) [Figure 5]b.
| Discussion | | |
Accessory MCA and duplicated MCA, are the most commonly seen variations involving the MCA.[6] When two vessels originate from the distal end of the ICA, the condition is called a duplicated MCA, and an anomalous vessel which originate directly from ACA is termed as accessory MCA.[7]
Padget [8] described the normal development of the cranial arterial system. According to her study, distal primitive ICA initially divides into a large branch, the future anterior choroidal artery, and numerous small arterial twigs that will subsequently constitute the primitive ACA and MCA. Partial persistence of the arterial twigs may be responsible for variations of MCA like accessory MCA or duplicated MCA.
The small arterial twigs coalesces together to form definitive MCA. Disturbance in this formation of definitive MCA by small arterial twigs may responsible for variations in MCA.
Small arterial twig instead of contribution in the formation of MCA may remain separate and get communicated with ACA and may persist as an accessory MCA. If an arterial twig gets communicated with the terminal portion of ICA or anterior choroidal artery, it may persist as the duplicated MCA.
As the embryological origin of MCA is from the ACA, the accessory MCA has been regarded as the remnant of the recurrent artery of Heubner (RAH).[9],[10],[11],[12] However, this theory is disproved because of the coexistence of both the vessels. An accessory MCA had a different course than the RAH.[7]
There are numbers of reports describing MCA. Uchino et al.[6] reported a case of the right accessory MCA with left MCA showing fenestration. Gibo et al.[2] reported a case associated with both variations that is, duplication and one accessory MCA. Jain [13] reported one case of bilateral duplication of MCAs in 300 brains. Dong et al.[14] reported a case with left MCA duplication, right accessory MCA and ACA fenestration.
It is said that true accessory MCAs originate from the A2 segment of the ACA An accessory MCA and a duplicated MCA both are simply additional outward buds of the ICA or ACA.[11] Yamamoto et al.[15] postulated that true accessory MCAs are residual congenital arteries and double MCA (DMCA) is a variant of the normal branching of the MCA.
Some authors have suggested that the DMCA are of two types as per their origin. Type 1 originates from the ICA at the exact level of its termination, type 2 from ICA or anterior choroidal artery.[2],[12],[16] In the present study DMCA was of type 1 seen in 0.88%.
Teal et al.[7] further classified two types of accessory MCAs based on the origin of variant vessels, which can be proximal (type 1) or distal (type 2) segments of the ACA.[2]
In present study accessory MCAs were found in 2.05%, so further classification into different types was not done. As per the classification of Teal et al. Accessory MCA found in the present study was type 2. That is, true Accessory MCA. It was taking origin from the postcommunicating segment of ACA.
There are different studies on the frequency of accessory and duplicated MCAs. The reported frequencies of accessory MCAs and duplicated MCAs were compared with the present study in [Table 3].
Double middle cerebral artery's themselves have no clinical significance. However, a rare aneurysms have been reported at the origin of the DMCA.[10],[18],[19]
Some authors states that an accessory MCA takes part in collateral blood supply to the territory of the main MCA and partly compensate for its occlusion, thus leading to an improved prognosis in patients with disease of this vessel.[11],[12]
According to Cekirge et al.[20] cerebral aneurysms are encountered more frequently in specimens with anatomic variations, such as an accessory MCA; however, the reason for this association is still vague. In the present study, we could not found any relation between accessary MCA with aneurysm.
Middle cerebral artery supplies a wider area and has more cortical branches than that of the ACA and PCA. In spite of a large territory of distribution and complex branching, the literature does not provide detailed information on the interrelations of those branches and their influence on terminal branching pattern of MCA, this issue is debatable.
The most interesting part of the MCA is the site of trunk separation and origin of the cortical branches from this point, and associated aneurysms are most interesting pathologies in relation to MCA.[21],[22] Terminations found in the present study were compared with the previous study in [Table 4]. | Table 4: Comparison of percentage and occurrence of different patterns of termination of MCA in different populations
Click here to view |
According to Grays spheroidal segment, is defined as M1 segment with course from its origin from ICA up to the separation of the main trunk. The conventional understanding is that the main trunk is separated into two trunks, that is, the superior and inferior trunks.[5] In the present study, MCA with a single trunk was found second most common in 20.58%.
Except the case reports on accessory MCA and its duplication, very few anatomical studies have described the termination and branching pattern of MCA. In the present study, the termination and branching pattern of MCA is described in detail.
Few findings of the present study were compared with the previous studies in [Table 5]. Findings are comparable to a little extent. In all of these studies, dominance of inferior trunk was most commonly observed.
Several authors have given importance to point of bifurcation that is, point of separation of MCA into two trunks. After this point of separation, the artery may separate into three (trifurcation), four (quadrifurcation), and multifurcation trunk, etc. Intermediate trunk is the middle trunk in the case of trifurcation.[2],[12],[30] Kahilogullari et al. proposed a new way of classification made in relation to the terminology of the intermediate trunk.[5] Despite the MCA's complex structure, variations are less commonly observed than in the othertwo arteries.[5],[11],[12]
Keeping this in view, the MCA was studied in detail and classified in four different types as bifurcated, trifurcated, quadrifurcated MCA and MCA with no trunks or single main trunk as per the termination.
In the present study dimensions of MCA were compared with the previous studies. Mean diameter found by the previous study was 3.35 mm. In the present study, it was 3 mm. Mean length of MCA found by Umansky et al.,[12] Yasargil and Fox,[22] and Pai et al.[26] was 15.1-15.7 mm, 14-16 mm and 20 mm respectively. While in the present study mean length of MCA was having little higher value of 25.5-27.8 mm. this difference may be because of the high incidence of single main trunked MCA (with a larger length). The present study proposed that the length of the MCA varies highly.
For the sake of interest present study had noted the symmetry and asymmetry of the MCA. It is surprising to note that the MCAs supplying two cerebral hemispheres in the same brain were with different branching patterns seen in 60% specimens of the present series. Symmetry as such has no clinical significance, but asymmetry itself may be an indication of variability in functional ability of two sides of the brain. Assessment of symmetry is the most neglected part and rarely described in the literature.
| Conclusion | | |
Awareness of these anatomical variations in branching patterns is important in neurovascular procedures. As very few anatomical studies on MCA are there in the literature, this type of research work should be done by a number of scientists from a different region of the world in large scale.
| References | | |
| 1. | Standring S. Gray's Anatomy. 39 th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005. P. 298.  |
| 2. | Gibo H, Carver CC, Rhoton AL Jr, Lenkey C, Mitchell RJ. Microsurgical anatomy of the middle cerebral artery. J Neurosurg 1981;54:151-69. |
| 3. | Grand W. Microsurgical anatomy of the proximal middle cerebral artery and the internal carotid artery bifurcation. Neurosurgery 1980;7:215-8. |
| 4. | Marinkovic SV, Kovacevic MS, Marinkovic JM. Perforating branches of the middle cerebral artery. Microsurgical anatomy of their extracerebral segments. J Neurosurg 1985;63:266-71. |
| 5. | Kahilogullari G, Ugur HC, Comert A, Tekdemir I, Kanpolat Y. The branching pattern of the middle cerebral artery: Is the intermediate trunk real or not? An anatomical study correlating with simple angiography. J Neurosurg 2012;116:1024-34. |
| 6. | Uchino A, Kato A, Takase Y, Kudo S. Middle cerebral artery variations detected by magnetic resonance angiography. Eur Radiol 2000;10:560-3. |
| 7. | Teal JS, Rumbaugh CL, Bergeron RT, Segall HD. Anomalies of the middle cerebral artery: Accessory artery, duplication, and early bifurcation. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1973;118:567-75. |
| 8. | Padget DH. The development of the cranial arteries in the human embryo. Control Embryol Carnegie Inst 1948;32:205-61. |
| 9. | Handa J, Shimizu Y, Matsuda M, Handa H. The accessory middle cerebral artery: Report of further two cases. Clin Radiol 1970;21:415-6. |
| 10. | Kitami K, Kamiyama H, Yasui N. Angiographic analysis of the middle cerebral artery in cerebral aneurysms — its branching pattern and so-called vascular anomalies. No Shinkei Geka 1985;13:283-90. |
| 11. | Komiyama M, Nishikawa M, Yasui T. The accessory middle cerebral artery as a collateral blood supply. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:587-90. |
| 12. | Umansky F, Dujovny M, Ausman JI, Diaz FG, Mirchandani HG. Anomalies and variations of the middle cerebral artery: A microanatomical study. Neurosurgery 1988;22:1023-7. |
| 13. | Jain KK. Some observations on the anatomy of the middle cerebral artery. Can J Surg 1964;7:134-9. |
| 14. | Dong LW, Yamada K, Ohta T, Takahashi N. Ruptured intracranial aneurysm combined with multiple cerebral vessel anomalies; A case report. No Shinkei Geka 1991;19:975-8. |
| 15. | Yamamoto H, Marubayashi T, Soejima T, Matsuoka S, Matsukado Y, Ushio Y. Accessory middle cerebral artery and duplication of middle cerebral artery — terminology, incidence, vascular etiology, and developmental significance. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1992;32:262-7. |
| 16. | Kai Y, Hamada J, Morioka M, Yano S, Kudo M, Kuratsu J. Treatment of unruptured duplicated middle cerebral artery aneurysm: Case report. Surg Neurol 2006;65:190-3. |
| 17. | Takahashi S, Hoshino F, Uemura K, Takahashi A, Sakamoto K. Accessory middle cerebral artery: Is it a variant form of the recurrent artery of Heubner? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989;10:563-8. |
| 18. | Choi JW, Joo SP, Lee JK, Kim TS. Middle cerebral artery variations. Associated with intracranial aneurysmal rupture. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2006;39:467-70. |
| 19. | Imaizumi S, Onuma T, Motohashi O, Kameyama M, Ishii K. Unruptured carotid-duplicated middle cerebral artery aneurysm: Case report. Surg Neurol 2002;58:322-4. |
| 20. | Cekirge HS, Peynircioglu B, Saatci I. Endovascular treatment of an “anterior cerebral artery” aneurysm in a patient with “embryonic unfused middle cerebral artery” anomaly: A case report. Neuroradiology 2005;47:690-4. |
| 21. | Dashti R, Hernesniemi J, Niemelä M, Rinne J, Porras M, Lehecka M, et al. Microneurosurgical management of middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms. Surg Neurol 2007;67:441-56. |
| 22. | Yasargil MG, Fox JL. The microsurgical approach to intracranial aneurysms. Surg Neurol 1975;3:7-14. |
| 23. | Ogeng'o JA, Njongo W, Hemed E, Obimbo MM, Gimongo J. Branching pattern of middle cerebral artery in an African population. Clin Anat 2011;24:692-8. |
| 24. | Vuillier F, Medeiros E, Moulin T, Cattin F, Bonneville JF, Tatu L. Main anatomical features of the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery: A 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T study. Surg Radiol Anat 2008;30:509-14. |
| 25. | Tanriover N, Kawashima M, Rhoton AL Jr, Ulm AJ, Mericle RA. Microsurgical anatomy of the early branches of the middle cerebral artery: Morphometric analysis and classification with angiographic correlation. J Neurosurg 2003;98:1277-90. |
| 26. | Pai SB, Varma RG, Kulkarni RN. Microsurgical anatomy of the middle cerebral artery. Neurol India 2005;53:186-90. [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 27. | Kulenovic A, Dilberovic F, Ovcina F. Variation in the flow and branching of the anterior and middle cerebral arteries. Med Arh 2003;57:3-5. |
| 28. | Idowu OE, Shokunbi MT, Malomo AO, Ogunbiyi JO. Size, course, distribution and anomalies of the middle cerebral artery in adult Nigerians. East Afr Med J 2002;79:217-20. |
| 29. | Türe U, Yasargil MG, Al-Mefty O, Yasargil DC. Arteries of the insula. J Neurosurg 2000;92:676-87. |
| 30. | Rhoton AL Jr. The supratentorial cranial space. Microsurgical anatomy and surgical approaches. Chapter 2: The supratentorial arteries. Neurosurgery 2002;51:S1-53-120. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]
|
