|
 |
|
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR |
|
|
|
| Year : 2022 | Volume
: 25
| Issue : 3 | Page : 517-519 |
| |
'Seatbelt Effect' of spasticity: Contrasting velocity dependence from the clasp knife phenomenon
Venkateswaran Ramanathan1, Dipti Baskar2, Hariswar Pari1
1 Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
2 Department of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| Date of Submission | 15-Sep-2021 |
| Date of Acceptance | 12-Oct-2021 |
| Date of Web Publication | 25-Jun-2022 |
Correspondence Address:
Venkateswaran Ramanathan
16, 6th Cross, Bharathy Nagar, Pondicherry - 605 008
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/aian.aian_817_21
How to cite this article:
Ramanathan V, Baskar D, Pari H. 'Seatbelt Effect' of spasticity: Contrasting velocity dependence from the clasp knife phenomenon. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2022;25:517-9 |
How to cite this URL:
Ramanathan V, Baskar D, Pari H. 'Seatbelt Effect' of spasticity: Contrasting velocity dependence from the clasp knife phenomenon. Ann Indian Acad Neurol [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 14];25:517-9. Available from: https://www.annalsofian.org/text.asp?2022/25/3/517/338853 |
Dear Editor,
The distinction between velocity dependence of spasticity from the other characteristic feature of spasticity, namely, the clasp knife phenomenon, is often not stated clearly or quickly discerned. While the lengthening reaction can be easily grasped with the analogy of a clasp knife, velocity dependence lacks an analogy. The underlying neural mechanisms between these two characteristics are different [Figure 1]. Hence, we wish to suggest a car seatbelt as an analogy, so that “velocity dependence” can be easily appreciated. | Figure 1: Characteristic features, analogy, and pathophysiology of common types of hypertonia. UMN – Upper Motor Neuron. GTO – Golgi Tendon Organ
Click here to view |
Several analogies are used to describe hypertonic states [Figure 1], which include spasticity, rigidity, and the less common paratonia. Based on certain key features, spasticity can be easily differentiated from rigidity at the bedside. Rigidity is a nonselective increase in the tone of agonist and antagonist without velocity dependence, and the increased tone remains uniform throughout the range of movement. On the contrary, spasticity is a velocity-dependent increase in tone resulting from the hyperexcitability of stretch reflexes.[1] It primarily involves the antigravity muscles – flexors of the upper limb and extensors of the lower limb. During the passive stretch, a brief “free interval” is appreciated in spasticity but not in rigidity because the resting muscle is electromyographically silent in spasticity. In contrast, in rigidity, the resting muscle shows firing.
Spasticity is also characterized by the “clasp knife phenomenon.” The clasp knife phenomenon refers to the sudden waning of tone after initial resistance [Figure 2], also referred to as a lengthening reaction.[2] This is because of inverse stretch reflex activation mediated by the Golgi tendon organ on sustained muscle stretching resulting in sudden relaxation of the muscle. The underlying mechanism of velocity dependence, which refers to the resistance offered by the muscle to a passive movement that varies proportionally with the speed of movement [Figure 2], is different.[3] This velocity-dependent exaggeration of stretch reflexes is due to increased muscle spindle excitability and velocity sensitivity of Ia spindle afferents, resulting in excessive activation of alpha motor neurons of the spinal cord.[4] | Figure 2: Lengthening reaction refers to the relation between the degree of passive stretch and the resistance to stretch. It is characterized by the sudden loss of resistance. Velocity dependence refers to the relation between the velocity of passive stretch and the resistance to stretch. It is characterized by a proportional increase in resistance with an increase in velocity
Click here to view |
The analogy of the car seatbelt helps us quickly appreciate velocity dependence and contrast it from the clasp knife effect seen in spasticity. The locking mechanism of a car's seatbelt is velocity dependent. This protective feature gets triggered, and the seatbelt holds the passenger to the seat when it is stretched beyond a critical velocity, as in sudden deceleration [Figure 3]. The mechanism can also be easily demonstrated by a brisk tug of the seat belt. Also, note that a gentle tug helps in uncoiling the belt before fastening it. Unlike the seatbelt, wherein the catch occurs only beyond a critical velocity, the velocity dependence of resistance in spasticity increases linearly and is proportional to the speed of movement.[5] However, this difference is of little significance clinically. | Figure 3: During an accident, the passenger continues to lurch forward, momentarily stretching the seatbelt at a high velocity. The velocity-dependent mechanism of seatbelt action gets activated, and it holds back the passenger to the seat
Click here to view |
While other analogies are vintage curiosities (lead pipes in plumbing, foldable pocket-knife, or key-wound wristwatches), our analogy of “seatbelt spasticity” is of much practical relevance today.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
 References | |  |
| 1. | Lance JW. Symposium synopsis. In: Feldman RG, Young RR, Koella WP, editors. Spasticity: Disordered Motor Control. Chicago: Yearbook Medical: 1980: p 485-94.  |
| 2. | Mukherjee A, Chakravarty A. Spasticity mechanisms for the clinician. Front Neurol 2010; 1:149. |
| 3. | Balci BP. Spasticity measurement. Noro Psikiyatr Ars 2018;55(Suppl 1): S49-53. |
| 4. | Dolbow J, Throckmorton Z. Neuroanatomy, Spinal Cord Myotatic Reflex. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021. |
| 5. | Beller H, inventor; Allied Corp, assignee. Safety seat belt retractor. United States patent US 3741496. 1973. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
|
